Thursday, December 4, 2014

HFOSS Quiz 2

0) Expand the following acronyms:

  • a) FOSS
    Free and Open Source Software

  • b) OLPC
    Stands for One Laptop Per Child, could also refer to the actual devices distributed (XOs)

  • c) tl;dr
    Too Long; Didn't Read

  • g) LGTM
    Looks Good To Me

  • h) RTFM
    Read The Freaking Manual
  • i) PEBKAC
    Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair (User Error)
  • f) LOL
    Lots Of Ligaments

1) Define the following instructional theories:

  • a) Didactic
    Focuses on engaging the student in a consistent scientific and educational style

  • b) Dialectic
    Also known as the Socratic Method it engages the student by asking questions and having the student deduce the answer on their own

  • c) Constructivist
    A system of learning that focuses on real world applications and hands on learning

  • d) Multiple Intelligences
    The idea that there is not one general intelligence on its own but rather human intelligence is derived from different intelligences that focus on different skills. For example someone may have a high level of linguistic intelligence that gives them a proficieny in language and writing but may have a lower logical intelligence and have a harder time with logic problems.

2) Describe the role of the instructor in each theory.

  • a) Didactic
    This is a traditional teaching style popularized by the old schools of Europe wherein the teacher is the one with the knowledge who imparts it onto the students. Teachers simply lecture to engage the students who must then engage themselves in what the teacher is saying to absorb the knowledge

  • b) Dialectic
    This style of teaching is more about leading a student to a conclusion of their own rather than telling them what the answer is to one problem and having them deduce the answer to another. Herein the teacher's goal is not to impart knowledge but to facilitate learning by administering questions.

  • c) Constructivist
    Similar to Dialectic learning where the teacher is again more of a moderator than an authority figure in this theory the teacher would be providing a "playground" for the students to work in to derive their own answers to more physical problems. A teacher following this style of learning may impart a concept to the students and then follow that up with a hands on demo to extrapolate the concept.

  • d) Multiple Intelligences
    Under this instructional theroy a teacher would be concerned more with which intelligence they are targeting with their curriculum. The teacher would also be concerned with which other instructional theory would best fit that type of intelligence they are trying to foster. A teacher of physics may feel that the intelligence that are concerned with is Logical-Mathematical intelligence and follow a more Dialectic or even Constructivist method of teaching while a teacher of rhetoric would be using a strictly Dialectic method to target a more Linguistic Intelligence.

3) What are the three key aspects of a lesson plan?

A Basic Lesson Plan's three elements are:
  • Objectives
  • Methods
  • Evaluation

4) How does Sugar integrate and implement constructivist learning theory?

The Sugar interface is based around the concept of "doing" things. Programs are "Activities" and the interface is designed to be explored. It's not holding your hand telling you what to look at, it's providing resources and paths to additional resources. On top of that I'd argue that the internet can do much of what a teacher would be doing in a perfectly Constructivist environment; the vast amount of information provided is a great asset when learning anything new and since the OLPCs can connect to the internet that already makes them a great facilitator of information. The internet however does not provide any sort of moderation.

Bonus: Where can new Sugar users and contributors go to find out more information, ask questions, and get involved?

The Sugar Labs wiki
Any IRC channel friendly to Sugar such as:
  • #rit-foss @ irc.freenode.net
  • #olpc-help @ irc.freenode.net

Tuesday, December 2, 2014

Lit Review 2: Hacking Politics TL:DR

Who
    Aaron Swartz, Alexis Ohanian, Andrew McDiarmid, Brad Burnham, Casey Rae-Hunter, Cory Doctorow, Dave Dayen, David Moon, David Segal, Edward J. Black, Elizabeth Stark, Erin McKeown, Ernesto Falcon, Gabriel Levitt, Huffington Post, John Perry Barlow, Jonny 5, Josh Levy, Joshua Bauchner, Julia O’Dwyer, Kim Dotcom, Larry Downes, Lawrence Lessig, Mark Zuckerberg, Mike Masnick, Nicole Powers, Open Congress, Patrick Ruffini, Ron Paul, The WGAW, Tiffiniy Cheng, Victoria A. Espinel, and Zoe Lofgren.

What
    Hacking Politics: TL:DR

Where
    Hosted on the RIT HFOSS class site here: http://hfoss-fossrit.rhcloud.com/static/books/hackingpolitics_txtwithcvfb.pdf

When
    Published in 2013

The Gist
        The TL:DR of Hacking Politics is a collection of quotes and anecdotes from a variety of hacktivists and politicians who were active in the fight against SOPA/PIPA and COICA. The various contributors talk about the causes, concerns, emotions and issues that surrounded the bills and the campaigns for and against them.

The Good
  1. Did a good job of drawing the reader in; it's just a collection of quotes, but it is by no means boring
  2. Even if you don't know the names of everyone in the book, their words have no less impact
  3. It does what a TL:DR is supposed to, and it does it well. By the end of it you know about the various issues surrounding SOPA/PIPA and what the bills would have actually done
 The Bad

  1.  Suffers slightly from obviously preaching to the choir
  2. Nothing in the TL:DR is cited or sourced; they're just quotes from prominent figures
  3. Felt a bit like it almost wasn't supposed to be read all at once; there was so much jumping around between voices it was a bit confusing.
The Questions
  1. The Writers Guild strike is mentioned briefly, I'm curious as to how much that impacted public opinion of SOPA/PIPA
  2. How much of the SOPA/PIPA bills were actually drafted/demanded by the entertainment industry's lobbyists?
  3. Was the goal of the bills aimed at curbing the 1st amendment or simply to turn a higher profit by attempting to shut down piracy sites.
Your Review
        If you weren't interested in SOPA/PIPA before, you will be now. If the TL;DR of Hacking Politics doesn't suck you into the book then nothing will. An excellent collection of quotes from many of the prominent figures in the fight for free speech and net neutrality. 9/10 Wombats.